What are the most controversial topics in Wikipedia? What articles have been subject to edit wars more than others? We now have a tool to explore what topics are most controversial in different languages and different parts of the world.
Wikipedia is great! There is no doubt about it. You may argue that it’s not reliable, it’s incomplete, it’s biased, etc, and I might agree. However, despite all these issues, Wikipedia IS useful, fast, practical and phenomenal!
Do you have any other example of a mass collaboration at the scale of Wikipedia with more 40 million editors, having produced more than 37 million articles in more than 280 languages?
Coordinating a small group of friends becomes a big issue when it’s about collaboration and reaching agreement on some topic, how is that possible that this huge number of unprofessional individuals with different backgrounds, cultures, opinions, come together and produce the largest encyclopaedia of all times?
Well, the answer is: it’s not easy and it’s not always smooth. Many Wikipedia articles are about neutral topic, like watermelon and hamsters. But there are lots of editorial wars and opinion clashes happening behind the scenes of Wikipedia as well. What are the main characteristics of these wars? What are the most disputed articles? Does it give us a window to how humans of different parts of the world think about stuff? It’s not difficult to observe some of the editorial wars in English Wikipedia, for example see the list of controversial issues in Wikipedia. But first of all there is no guarantee that these lists are inclusive, and more importantly, such lists are only available for the biggest language editions like English Wikipedia.
There have been already nice studies on Wikipedia conflict, but unfortunately only limited to English Wikipedia. In a recent multidisciplinary project (see the paper), my colleagues Anselm Spoerri (communication and Information scientist), Mark Graham (geographer) , János Kertész (senior physicist), and I (physicist in transition to computational social scientist) studied Wikipedia editorial wars in 13 different language editions including: English, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, … Persian, Arabic, Hebrew, … Czech, Hungarian, Romanian, …. Chinese and Japanese.
We have developed our tools to locate, quantify, and rank the most controversial articles in different language editions without being able to read the language! Our method to measure editorial wars has been reported in our previous papers on Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia and Edit wars in Wikipedia.
Now that we have measures of controversy for all the articles in the language editions under study, we could have lots of fun!
First take a look at the awesome post by Mark on mapping conflict and geographical locations of the controversial articles, and then I’ll tell you something about most debated topics in different language editions.
Here’s the top-10 list of most controversial articles in different languages:
|1||George W. Bush||Croatia||Ségolène Royal||Chile||São Paulo||Homosexuality||Gypsy Crime||FC Universitatea Craiova||Ash’ari||Báb||Chabad||Koreans in Japan||Taiwan|
|2||Anarchism||Scientology||Unidentified flying object||Club América||Brazil||Psychotronics||Atheism||Mircea Badea||Ali bin Talal al Jahani||Fatimah||Chabad messianism||Korea origin theory||List of upcoming TVB series|
|3||Muhammad||9/11 conspiracy theories||Jehovah’s Witnesses||Opus Dei||Rede Record||Telepathy||Hungarian radical right||Disney Channel (Romania)||Muhammad||Mahmoud Ahmadinejad||2006 Lebanon War||Men’s rights||TVB|
|4||List of WWE personnel||Fraternities||Jesus||Athletic Bilbao||José Serra||Communism||Viktor Orbán||Legionnaires’ rebellion & Bucharest pogrom||Ali||People’s Mujahedin of Iran||B’Tselem||internet right-wing||China|
|5||Global warming||Homeopathy||Sigmund Freud||Andrés Manuel López Obrador||Grêmio Foot-Ball Porto Alegrense||Homophobia||Hungarian Guard Movement||Lugoj||Egypt||Criticism of the Quran||Benjamin Netanyahu||AKB48||Chiang Kai-shek|
|6||Circumcision||Adolf Hitler||September 11 attacks||Newell’s Old Boys||Sport Club Corinthians Paulista||Jesus||Ferenc Gyurcsány’s speech in May 2006||Vladimir Tismăneanu||Syria||Tabriz||Jewish settlement in Hebron||Kamen Rider Series||Ma Ying-jeou|
|7||United States||Jesus||Muhammad al-Durrah incident||FC Barcelona||Cyndi Lauper||Moravia||The Mortimer case||Craiova||Sunni Islam||Ali Khamenei||Daphni Leef||One Piece||Chen Shui-bian|
|8||Jesus||Hugo Chávez||Islamophobia||Homeopathy||Dilma Rousseff||Sexual orientation change efforts||Hungarian Far- right||Romania||Wahhabi||Ruhollah Khomeini||Gaza War||Kim Yu-Na||Mao Zedong|
|9||Race and intelligence||Minimum wage||God in Christianity||Augusto Pinochet||Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva||Ross Hedvíček||Jobbik||Traian Băsescu||Yasser Al-Habib||Massoud Rajavi||Beitar Jerusalem F.C.||Mizuho Fukushima||Second Sino-Japanese War|
|10||Christianity||Rudolf Steiner||Nuclear power debate||Alianza Lima||Guns N’ Roses||Israel||Polgár Tamás||Romanian Orthodox Church||Arab people||Muhammad||Ariel Sharon||GoGo Sentai Boukenger||Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|
Interesting and familiar titles, right? Did you realise that some titles appear in many different language editions? Many of them are about religion: Jesus; countries: Israel, Brazil; politics: Ségolène Royal, George W. Bush.
If you’d like to take a look at the top-100 or in case you fancy having the complete lists with controversy score, get them from here.
What you see at the right is a Word Cloud of all the titles in top-100 lists.
There are interesting patterns. Similarities and differences. International and global issues and very local items. An interactive visualization of top-100 lists in different languages to show overlaps and similarities, is waiting for you here.
To have a more general picture, we would have to look further than just “titles”. We need to consider more general topics and concepts, which the articles can be categorised based on.
We hand-coded all the articles in top-100 lists with 10 different category tags. See the population of topical categories in each language in the interactive chart below (click on it!).
Some interesting patterns: Religion and Politics are debated in Persian, Arabic, and Hebrew even more than the others. Spanish and Portuguese Wikipedias are full of wars on football clubs. French and Czech Wikipedias have relatively more disputed articles on science and technology related topics. Chinese and Japanese Wikipedia are battle fields for manga, anime, TV series, and entertainment fans. TVB product appear quite often in the Chinese list, and well, the number 19 most disputed article in Japanese Wikipedia is “Penis”!
“So What?” is probably what you are asking. Generally speaking the implication of these kind of studies are two-fold:
1) These results could help Wikipedia and similar projects (which are already many, and growing) to be better designed, considering these experiences and the observations we made. Local effects shouldn’t be neglected and specially Wikipedias with smaller community of editors could be inefficiently very much focused on local issues.
2) we believe that this kind of case-studies (Wikipedia being the case) could help us and social scientist to understand more about human societies. Topics like conflict emergence, its dynamics, its universal features, and the resolution mechanisms could be empirically examined for the first time. Most of the theories in social science could have never been tested against real world experiments (in contrast to natural sciences). But now, thanks to our digital life of today, we are able to track and analyse all the actions and interactions of a huge society of individuals (here, Wikipedia editors), so why not test the pre-existing social theories in a large “social experiment” of Wikipedia?
Read more about this project:
Yasseri, Taha, Spoerri, Anselm, Graham, Mark and Kertesz, Janos, The Most Controversial Topics in Wikipedia: A Multilingual and Geographical Analysis (May 23, 2013). Fichman P., Hara N., editors. Global Wikipedia: International and Cross-Cultural Issues in Online Collaboration. Scarecrow Press (2014), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2269392
And more on Wikipedia by our team:
Török, J., Iñiguez, G., Yasseri, T., San Miguel, M., Kaski, K., and Kertész, J. (2013) Opinions, Conflicts and Consensus: Modeling Social Dynamics in a Collaborative Environment. Physical Review Letters 110 (8).
Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A., and Kertész, J. (2012) Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38869.
Yasseri, T., Kornai, A., and Kertész, J. (2012) A practical approach to language complexity: a Wikipedia case study. PLoS ONE 7(11): e48386.
Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., and Kertész, J. (2012) Circadian patterns of Wikipedia editorial activity: A demographic analysis. PLoS ONE 7(1): e30091.
Mestyán, M., Yasseri, T., and Kertész, J. (2012) Early Prediction of Movie Box Office Success based on Wikipedia Activity Big Data.
Note: This post was originally published on Taha Yasseri's blog on . It might have been updated since then in its original location. The post gives the views of the author(s), and not necessarily the position of the Oxford Internet Institute.